Commentary for Bava Kamma 61:14

לא שהיה להן לעמוד

Now, does this not mean that he stopped for the purpose of shouldering the beam as is usual with carriers, and it yet says that he is liable, [presumably] because [he failed] to caution?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which would thus support the interpretation given by R. Nahman and contradict the view expounded by R. Johanan. ');">⁷</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 61:14. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.